Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-07

OM KANT & ORS. vs THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-1734/2025 2025:DHC:6583
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
OM KANT & ORS.
Respondent
THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 07.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 1734/2025 & CRL.M.A. 7782/2025 OM KANT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dewal Singh, Mr. Sumit Kumar and Mr. Pulkit Singh, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with W/SI Priyanka Ms. Garima Gupta and Mr. Chirag Mudgal, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 207/2021 of Police Station Samaypur Badli for offence under Sections 323/354B/509/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Respondent no. 2 present in Court and identified by IO/SI Priyanka accepts notice. Learned APP accepts notice. 3. I have spoken with both sides. It appears that cross FIRs were CRL. M.C. 1734/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.07 18:05:41 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:07.08.2025 18:10:07 registered on account of an incident that took place involving two sides. The cross FIR bearing No. 202/2021 of same police station, for same offences as in the present case, has already been quashed today itself by a coordinate bench of this Court, as informed by all present. The respondent no. 2 submits that being relatives, parties have settled all disputes. Respondent no. 2

OM KANT & ORS. vs THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. · Niyam