NUTAN TYAGI vs STATE

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 17th May, 2025 Pronounced on: 1st August, 2025 + CRL.REV.P. 763/2016 NUTAN TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Adv. Versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pardeep Gahlot, APP for the State. ASI Om Prakash, P.S. Sarai Rohilla. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA JUDGMENT AMIT SHARMA, J. 1. The present petition under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeks the following prayers:- “1. Set Aside The Impugned Judgment And Order Dated 30.9.2016 & 08.11.2016 Passed By Ms. Poonam Chaudhary, Ld. Special Judge-07 (Central) (PC Act Cases of ACB, GNCTD) , Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in appeal bearing no. 08/2016 against the judgment and order of conviction passed by Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate-04, (Central-District) Tis Hazari, Delhi On 23.09.2015 and 14.08.2016, in Case FIR No. 499/2004 U/S 279/304a IPC, P.S. Sarai Rohilla, Delhi Whereby Ld. Appellate Court Confirm The Order Of The Conviction And Convicted The Petitioner For The Offence Under Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BHASKAR SINGH RAWAT CRL.REV.P. 763/2016 Page 1 of 27 Signing Date:01.08.2025 09:35:50 Section 279/304A IPC and modified the sentence of S.I. Of 2 month for the offence U/S 279 IPC and S.I. Of 2 month for the offence U/S 304A IPC; ii. The petitioner be acquitted from the Charges U/s 279/304A IPC. iii. Any other relief or direction, which your lordships may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” BACKGROUND 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- 2.1 On 26.09.2004, upon receiving DD No. 18 PP Inderlok, ASI Mohd. Rajiq along with Constable Ashok Kumar reached at t