MURARI MOHAN vs MEENAKSHI SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

$~J- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 01st August, 2025 + RFA 700/2025 MURARI MOHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocate. versus MEENAKSHI SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Tyagi and Mr. Ridam Tyagi, Advocates. Respondent in-person. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J U D G M E N T ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J. CM APPL. 46770/2025 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RFA 700/2025 CM APPL. 46769/2025 (stay) By way of the present regular first appeal filed under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the appellant inter alia impugns judgment and order dated 03.06.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in suit bearing 17 CS No. 2699/24, whereby the suit filed by the respondent seeking a decree of possession, permanent injunction and Signature Not Verified Signed By:ANJALI KAUSHIK Signing Date:14.08.2025 11:52:51 RFA 700/2025 Page 1 of 11 mesne profits was decreed, based on an application under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC filed by the respondent. 2. Issue notice. 3. Mr. Pradeep Tyagi, learned counsel appears for the respondent on advance copy; and accepts notice. 4. Considering the contours of the matter as discernible from the record; and in view of the contents of the impugned judgment, the matter is taken-up for disposal at the stage of issuance of notice itself. 5. From the record, it is seen that summons in the suit were issued on 22.11.2024, pursuant to which the appellant (defendant in the suit) entered appearance on 06.02.2024 and filed his written statement dated 23.12.2024 as well as an additional written statement dated 27.03.2025. 6. Subsequently on 08.04.2025, the respondent (plaintiff in the suit