MS ANJU vs SH GURMUKH SINGH SACHDEV

$~95 & 96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27th, August, 2025 CM(M) 1634/2025 & CM APPL. 53356-53357/2025 MS ANJU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Ms. Ritika Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Ms. Prachi Dutta and Mr. Jatin Awasthi, Advocates. versus SH GURMUKH SINGH SACHDEV .....Respondent Through: None. CM(M) 1635/2025 & CM APPL. 53360-53361/2025 ANJU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Ms. Ritika Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Ms. Prachi Dutta and Mr. Jatin Awasthi, Advocates. versus GURMUKH SINGH SACHDEV .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending one eviction petition filed on the ground of bona fide requirement i.e. under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. 2. Needless to say, the procedure applicable for such type of eviction 3. The petitioner i.e. tenant has already filed an application seeking leave to defend and when the learned Controller was at the stage of hearing argument on such leave to defend application, the tenant filed two different applications. 4. By virtue of one application, she was seeking appointment of Local Commissioner so that suc