MOHINDER PAHUJA vs DAYA NAND TOKAS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22nd, August, 2025 CM(M) 1052/2025, CM APPL. 34791/2025 & CM APPL. 34792/2025 MOHINDER PAHUJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Dhruv Chaudhary, Mr. Gurpreet Singh and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates versus DAYA NAND TOKAS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Pursuant to issuance of notice, Mr. Saurabh Sharma, learned Counsel for respondent appears and draws the attention of this Court to order dated 06.05.2024. 2. He submits that the spare copies of the plaint and documents was available on record that day and even the learned Trial Court had asked the defendant to collect the same against acknowledgment. He submits that, for the reason best known to the defendant or his counsel, no endeavor was made to collect the copy, thereof, and, therefore, their grievance that their written statement has been closed, unwarrantedly, is totally without any substance. 3. However, after hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for 4. Undoubtedly, the order dated 06.05.2024 is amply clear and the learned Trial Court very clearly specified in