Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-22

MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED vs THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

Citation / case number
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM)-54/2024 2025:DHC:7141
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED
Respondent
THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on: 22.08.2025 C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 54/2024 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....Appellant versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Hemant Daswani, Ms. Saumya Bajpai & Ms. Pranjal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Vinay Yadav, SPC along with Ms. Kamna Behrani, Mr. Ansh Kalra & Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT 1. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”), being aggrieved by the Order dated 15.03.2024 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the Examiner of Trade Marks (“Examiner”), refusing the Appellant's Application for registration of the mark PETKIND (“Subject Trade Mark”) bearing Application No. 5157441 (“Application”) in Class 5. 2. The learned Examiner has refused the Application on the ground that there is a prior application to the Subject Trade Mark for registration of a mark which is phonetically and visually similar to the Subject Trade Mark 3. The Appellant is a leading marketer of wide range of pharmaceutical, medicinal and veterinary preparations in India under it