MANISHA SEJWAL vs DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 06.08.2025 + W.P.(C) 11728/2025 & CM APPL. 48008/2025 MANISHA SEJWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Aditya Sharma, Mr. F. I. Choudhary, Mr.Vimal Nigam, Mr.David Choudhary & Mr.Anurag Nagar, Advs. versus DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, SC with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Aliza Alam, Mr.Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No.1945/2017, titled Manisha Sejwal v. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board & Ors., whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the O.A. filed by the petitioner herein. 2. To give a brief background of the facts from which the present petition arises, the respondent no. 1 advertised vacancies for the post of PGT (Political Science) by an Advertisement dated 15.06.2012. Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAJ BALA W.P.(C) 11728/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signing Date:11.08.2025 19:19:15 The petitioner had applied for the said post on 27.02.2014. 3. The petitioner cleared the Tier-I Examination for the said post. In the Tier-II Examination, however, the petitioner was declared unsuccessful. The respondent no.1 then published the Answer Key for Tier-II Examination on 16.07.2015. Finding mistakes therein, the petitioner and other submitted representations to the respondent no. 1. 4. On 06.06.2016, the respondent no. 1 published a Revised Answer Key, correcting the answers to as many as 77 questions. The petitioner, still not being satisfied and clai