Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-01

M/S MOTION INDUSTRIES vs SMT. MEENA JAIN

Citation / case number
RFA(COMM)-76/2025 2025:DHC:6410-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S MOTION INDUSTRIES
Respondent
SMT. MEENA JAIN
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(COMM) 76/2025, CM APPLs. 6980/2025 & 6986/2025 M/S MOTION INDUSTRIES .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikas Goyal, Mr. Harsh Vardhan, and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advs. versus SMT. MEENA JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 01.08.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Following the order passed on the last date of hearing, Mr. Piyush Chaudhary appears on behalf of the respondent. He acknowledges that the entire amount in terms of para 23 of the judgment dated 18 October 2024 and decree dated 29 November 2024 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court) in CS (Comm) 292/2024 has been paid except for electricity and water charges. 2. Mr. Puri, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submits that the electricity and water charges would be paid forthwith. RFA(COMM) 76/2025 3. Mr. Chaudhary has also handed over, in Court, a demand draft for the security deposit which had been paid by the appellants. 4. Mr. Puri seeks, on instructions, two weeks’ further and final opportunity for his client to