KAPTAN @ KAPTAN SINGH @ RAJU vs STATEOF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 4471/2025 KAPTAN @ KAPTAN SINGH @ RAJU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate. versus STATEOF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Shriom Dagar, PS Vikaspuri. Mr. Ravi Shukla, Advocate for R-2 (through videoconferencing) with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 215/2012 of PS Vikas Puri for offence under Section 363 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.3) and prosecutrix (respondent no.2) have compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. It appears that the FIR was registered on the missing complaint lodged by respondent no.3 as the respondent no.2 had eloped with the petitioner and they got married. CRL.M.C. 4471/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb483 5d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2e ee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.14 18:05:11 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:14.08.2025 18:15:41 3. Detailed statements of respondent no.2 and 3 were recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. Learned APP submits that State has no serious objection if the FIR is quashed. 4. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi and it is stated by them that now they are living happily with their four children aged three years to ten years. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not want to pursue prosecution of petitioner because they are li