HASAN MOHD vs STATE(NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 26.08.2025 + CRL.A. 1102/2024 HASAN MOHD .....Appellant Through: Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Advocate with appellant in person versus STATE(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with SI Sneha Bhakat Mr.Himanshu Anand Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth B., Mr.Shekhar, Ms.Navneet and Mr.Mike Desai, Advocates for DSLSA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.(BAIL) 1980/2024 Since arguments in the appeal itself have been heard, this application seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. CRL.A. 1102/2024 1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the judgement of conviction dated 03.06.2024 and order on sentence dated 13.08.2024, ASJ(FTSC)(POSCO)-01, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in SC No. 57719/2016 arising out of FIR No. 125/2015 registered under sections 376/342 IPC at P.S. Mayapuri, Delhi. Signature Not Verified Signed By:GAUTAM CRL.A. 1102/2024 Page 1 of 6 ASWAL Signing Date:30.08.2025 19:01:57 Vide the aforesaid order on sentence, the appellant was directed to undergo RI for a period of 06 months without fine for the offence punishable under section 342 IPC; further directed to undergo RI for a period of 01 year for the offence punishable under section 12 POCSO Act alongwith fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default whereof to undergo RI for 03 months. Benefit under section 428 Cr.P.C was provided to the appellant and sentences were directed to be run concurrently. The sentence of the appellant was suspended by this court vide order dated 27.11.2024 2. The facts, in a nutshell, noted by the Trial Court are extracted hereunder: “On 06.03.2015 vide DD no. 23A SI Savita Sarkar