HARPREET SAWHNEY vs PUNEET SHARMA

Judgment text excerpt

$~19 and 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 14.08.2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 634/2025 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner Through: versus PUNEET SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tatini Basu and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advs. with Respondent in-person. + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 299/2024 HARPREET SAWHNEY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Priya Hingorani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naseem Ahmed and Mr. Aditya Bajaj, Advs. versus PUNEET SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tatini Basu and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advs. with Respondent in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The present Matrimonial Appeal has been filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assailing correctness of the order dated 12.07.2024 passed in HMA No.1931/2019 passed by the Ld. Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari, Delhi captioned Harpreet Sawhney vs Puneet Sharma, directing the Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:19.08.2025 13:14:29 Respondent to pay Rs.1,00,000/- per month for both his children from April, 2024. 2. On a perusal of the record, it appears that both the Appellant and the Respondent are working professionals. The Appellant is drawing a monthly salary of Rs.1,25,000/- out of which she is paying Rs.56,000/- towards EMI for the house (Flat No. 04124 ATS Greens Paradiso, Section CHI4, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh – 201310) purchased by the couple. Thus, she is left with a lump sum amount of Rs.70,000/- every month for the remaining expenses. 3. Both the children are studying in Shiv Nadar School, Noida. This Court has been apprised of the fact that apart from the school fee of