GULAM DUSTGEER ANSARI vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 08.08.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2006/2025 GULAM DUSTGEER ANSARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma and Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Sanjay Bhardwaj, PS Adarsh Nagar Mr. Kanwar Anshuman Singh, Advocate for complainant de facto CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 404/2024 of PS Adarsh Nagar for offence under Section 420/406/34 IPC. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant de facto. 2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is as follows. The complainant de facto is working as super distributor with X company. The accused/applicant is working as distributor under the complainant de facto. Both parties are engaged in routine business transactions and payment of money, whereunder BAIL APPLN. 2006/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH KATHPALIA 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626ca cca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c4879 65ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.08 17:55:38 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:08.08.2025 18:14:51 the complainant de facto would transfer units in the account of X company and value thereof would be paid by the accused/applicant. In the course of such transactions, the accused/applicant stopped paying money to the complainant de facto. That led to registration of the present case. 3. Learned coun