Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-22

FARDEEN ALI & ORS. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-1698/2025 2025:DHC:7181
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
FARDEEN ALI & ORS.
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 22.08.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C.1698/2025 FARDEEN ALI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abdul Gaffar, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. … Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Animesh Anand, PS-Jagatpuri. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. R-2 and R-3 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 647/2024, dated 18.12.2024, registered at P.S Jagatpuri, Delhi under Sections 110/115(2)/126(2)/3(5) BNS (Section 308/323/341/34 IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per averments made in the FIR, on 17.12.2024 Respondent No. 2 and respondent no. 3 were attacked by petitioners and accomplices with sticks, dandas, and a hammer over a property CRL.M.C. 1698/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:23.08.2025 16:17:03 dispute. Respondent no. 3 sustained a head injury, while respondent no. 2 suffered a bruise. FIR was lodged at instance of respondent no. 2 under sections 110/115(2)/126(2)/3(5) BNS against the petitioners. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding/ Compromise Deed dated 22.02.2025. Copy of the Memorandum of Understanding/ Compromise Deed dated 22.02.2025 has been annexed as Annexure A/4. 4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Ani

FARDEEN ALI & ORS. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. · Niyam