EX-CONSTABLE VIRENDER SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 16812/2022 EX-CONSTABLE VIRENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender Singh Tomar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Subhash Tanwar (CGSC), Mr. Naveen, Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Harshit Deshwal, Advs. with Mr. Devender Singh (Dy. JAG) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER(ORAL) % 25.08.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. It is a matter of concern that the petitioner, despite having an opinion by the Medical Board in his favour, specifically stating that the disability (Trivial Mitral Regurgitation) from which he was found to suffer, 13 years after he had joined the respondent ITBP, has had to struggle for 3 years for his due entitlement to disability pension. 2. The law as regards disability pension is well settled. We have had an occasion to examine the entire legal position recently in our decision in UOI v Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso1. Subsequently, the said 1 2025 SCC Online Del 2018 3. Moreover, in the present case, there is an opinion by the Medical Board which specifically states that the disability from which the petitioner was found to be suffering was