DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD (DSSSB) AND ORS vs SATYAVIR SINGH AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21.08.2025 + W.P.(C) 3064/2024 & CM APPL. 12592/2024 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD (DSSSB) AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan & Ms.Archana Chaudhary, Advs versus SATYAVIR SINGH AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.M.K. Gaur & Mr.Anoop Kumar, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 02.05.2023 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the, ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 3887/2016, titled Satyavir Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors., disposing of the said O.A., with an innocuous direction as under:- “3. We, therefore, order as under:- The respondents are directed to supply to the applicant the status with respect to his result as well as the last candidate Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:REYMON VASHIST W.P.(C) 3064/2024 Page 1 of 3 Signing Date:26.08.2025 17:07:37 who has been selected in terms of the re- drawn merit list. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.” 2. It is the case of the respondents that the respondents had applied for the post of Fire Operator against the 315 vacancies advertised by the petitioners, vide advertisement No.003/1999 dated 06.05.1999. It is averred that the petitioners herein had issued the result of only 149 candidates out of 315 vacancies, along with a list of 35 candidates, whose results were shown to be kept in abeyance. The respondents submitted that no reason was assigned for not selecting them in the impugned selection process. The respondents, approach