DEEPAK @ KALE AND ANR vs STATE(NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 1472/2025 & CRL.M.A. 6564/2025 DEEPAK @ KALE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Pandey and Mr. Anshuman Tiwari, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Brahm Prakash and Inspector Sanjay Kumar, PS Sultanpuri. Respondents no.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 271/2009 of PS Sultanpuri, Delhi for offence under Section 324/34 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) and the injured (respondent no.3) have settled the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no serious objection because the trial is pending since the year 2009 and the complainant de facto and injured have not supported prosecution in their testimony during trial. CRL.M.C. 1472/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2ee e60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.11 17:43:56 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:11.08.2025 17:48:53 3. The respondents no.2 & 3, present with their counsel and identified by IO/SI Brahm Prakash accept notice. 4. I have spoken with the parties. It is submitted by respondents no.2 & 3 that towards full and final settlement of injuries caused to respondent no.3 by the petitioners, the latter have paid a compensation amount of Rs. 40,000/-. Respondent