COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION vs M/S OBSSIOBN NAAZ & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~SB-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 22th AUGUST, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF: + CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/2015, CRL.M.A. 50201/2018, CRL.M.A. 14374/2025 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) versus M/S OBSESSION NAAZ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Mr. Pankaj Balwan, Mr. Saarthak Bansal, Advs. for Defendants No. 2 to 5, 7 to 10, 17 to 20, 23, 25 & 28 Mr. Bahar U. Barqi Advocate for R- 10, 11, 12, 13, 21 & 22. Mr. Sagar Saxena, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Mr. Karan Chaudhary & Mr. Krisnandu Haldar, Advs. for R-1, 9, 24, 27 Md. Waqar, Advocate for R-26 Ms. Sushila Narang, Advocate for R-29 & R-30 Mr. Amit Ranjan, Adv. for Samsung Electronics & Samsung India Mr. Soumya Chakraborty Senior Advocate with Ms. Nandini Sen Advocate for Kolkata Police Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/2015 Page 1 of 44 By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR Signing Date:22.08.2025 16:55:31 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J. 1. The present proceedings emanates from a mentioning made by Mr. Shravan Sahary, Advocate, who was one of the 11 Advocate Commissioners appointed by this Court vide Order dated 23.12.2014 passed by this Court in CS(OS) No.4024/2014. This Court was informed that the 11 Advocate Commissioners who had gone to Kolkata to perform the task entrusted to them by this Court by the said Order were attacked by an unruly mob which gathered there to prevent the Advocate Commissioners from performing the mandate of this Court. 2. Mr. Shravan Sahary, Advocate, apprised the Court that he was severely injured around his right eye, left cheek and two of his front teeth were broken in the incident which took place du