CONDOR FOOTWEAR (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. vs NEXGEN FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 22.08.2025 + CS(COMM) 605/2024 & I.A. 34116/2024 CONDOR FOOTWEAR (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Versus NEXGEN FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiff : Mr. Manish Biala, Advocate. For the Defendants : Mr. Utsav Garg, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J OA No.74/2025 1. This is an Original Appeal filed by Defendants under Rule 5 of Chapter II of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 (“DHC Rules”) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) against the Order dated 17.01.2025 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) of this Court in CS(COMM) No.605/2024. Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 605/2024 Page 1 of 10 Signed By:NEELAM SHARMA Signing Date:22.08.2025 16:22:00 2. Vide Impugned Order, the learned Joint Registrar has held as under: “The pleadings have been completed. The counsel for the defendant is objecting to the taking on record of the documents filed by the plaintiff alongside the replication. The objection is overruled since the documents are part of the pleading i.e. the replication & are not causing any prejudice at this stage. The parties shall now file the photocopies of their admitted- documents, if not already filed and the joint schedule of the documents. List the matter for admission-denial and making of exhibits on 25.03.2025.” 3. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Defendants that the documents filed by the Plaintiffs along with the Replication was in response to the specific plea taken by the Defendants that the Plaint did not show any cause of action arising against the Defendants to show that the Defendants were