Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-06

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -TDS-01 vs DIAMOND TREE

Citation / case number
ITA-275/2025 2025:DHC:6529-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -TDS-01
Respondent
DIAMOND TREE
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~113 & 114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 06.08.2025 ITA 275/2025 ITA 276/2025 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-TDS-01 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC & Ms.Aditi Sabharwal, Advocate. versus DIAMOND TREE .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) 1. The challenge in these appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is to the common order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘B’, New Delhi (ITAT) in ITA No.5062/Del/2024 and ITA No.5063/Del/20024. 2. Both the appeals relate to Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12 and AY 2015-16 respectively. 3. The ITAT decided the aforesaid appeals in favour of the respondent/ 4. It is in this factual backdrop that the Revenue vehemently argues before us that there was a compo site agreement for rent as well as common area maintenance charges which attracts the impugned higher rate of TDS deduction u/s 194I of the Act in light of Sunil Kumar Gupta (2016)(9) TMI 1198 (P&H). We note that this tribunal in Connaught Plaza Restaurant