Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-28

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 34 of 2022 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 34 of 2022 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 34 of 2022 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 34 of 2022 Ram Karan (Wric 1002495/2008 ) And 37 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus M/S Vespa Car Company Ltd. Salon Thru. Manager P And A And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yadukul Shiromani Srivastava (Y.S.Lohit) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. (C. M. Application No. 3 of 2022) 1. Heard Shri Y.S. Lohit, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Service upon opposite party no. 5 in the application for review is not sufficient as per report dated 29.04.2025 of the Registrar concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the opposite party no. 1- Company in the review application has been sold and has been purchased by the proposed opposite party no. 5. 4. On being asked to demonstrate as to what is proof that the opposite party no. 1- M/s Vespa Car Company Limited has been sold and it had been purchased by the proposed opposite party no. 5. All that has been placed before us is a news item and reference to a document dated 06.04.2022, however, on its perusal, there is nothing to show that opposite party no. 1- Company w

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 34 of 2022 at Lucknow · Niyam