Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-18

CHHATARPUR FARM WELFARE SOCIETY (REGD.) vs PRIYANSHU AGRAWAL & ORS.

Citation / case number
LPA-371/2025 2025:DHC:7089-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
CHHATARPUR FARM WELFARE SOCIETY (REGD.)
Respondent
PRIYANSHU AGRAWAL & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 371/2025, CM APPL. 34798/2025, CM APPL. 34799/2025, CM APPL. 34800/2025 & CM APPL. 34801/2025 CHHATARPUR FARM WELFARE SOCIETY (REGD.) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Gahlot, Ms. Smita Mann, Mr. Vishal Mann, Mr. Kartik Dabas, Mr. Yuvraj Bajaj and Ms. Zahid Laiq Ahmed, Advocates. Versus PRIYANSHU AGRAWAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anup Kumar, Ms. Neha Jaiswal, Ms. Shruti Singh and Mr. Shivam Kumar, , Advocates for R-1 to 13. Mr. Siddhant Nath, Standing Counsel with Mr. Bhavishya Makhija and Mr. Amaan Khan, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel (Civil) with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocate for R-12, 14 and 15/GNCTD. Mr. Ajay Jain, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Bijay Lakshmi, Ms. Kashish Gupta, Mr. Manoj, Mr. Krishna Sharma and Mr. M.N. Mishra, Advocates for R-16 and 17. Mr. Tushar Sannu and Ms. Aqsa, Advocates for DDA. % Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 LPA 371/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Date:20.08.2025 18:11:28 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGEMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J: (ORAL) 1. Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the order dated 19.05.2025 (hereinafter referred to as “impugned interim order”) passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6353/2021 titled “Priyanshi Agarwal & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.”, wherein the learned Single Judge has directed that the private respondents/writ petitioners as well as the general public shall be allowed access through the roads in question, and that they shall not be charged any money for using the said roads. 2. It is the case of the appellant/society that the streets/passages

CHHATARPUR FARM WELFARE SOCIETY (REGD.) vs PRIYANSHU AGRAWAL & ORS. · Niyam