Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-11

BHUPENDER@JOKHAR vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
W.P.(CRL)-2431/2025 2025:DHC:6715
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
BHUPENDER@JOKHAR
Respondent
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 + W.P.(CRL) 2431/2025 BHUPENDER@JOKHAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arjit Sharma, Advocate with Inspector Vikas Mudgal. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. In furtherance of last order, petitioner filed amended writ petition dated 07.08.2025, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent State accompanied with IO/Inspector Vikas Mudgal accepts notice. Both sides submit that in view of nature of these proceedings, final arguments may be heard today itself. As such, I have heard learned counsel for both sides. 2. The petitioner has assailed order dated 10.06.2025 of the Competent Authority whereby his application for grant of parole in case FIR No. 629/2016 of PS Mukherjee Nagar for offence under Section 302/120B/34 IPC was rejected. 3. The parole application of petitioner was rejected by the Competent W.P.(CRL) 2431/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2ee e60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.11 17:38:53 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:11.08.2025 17:48:53 Authority on the ground that earlier he was released on emergency parole with effect from 15.05.2021 and was re-arrested on 19.07.2022 in a new case FIR No.587/2022 of PS Paschim Vihar for offence under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 25/27 of Arms Act. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that i

BHUPENDER@JOKHAR vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI · Niyam