BHANU PRATAP vs VIMAL AGGARWAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11th August, 2025 CM(M) 1491/2025 & CM APPL. 49165/2025 & CM APPL. 49166/2025 & CM APPL. 49167/2025 BHANU PRATAP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Yadav, Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Vishwanath and Mr. Viraj Kaushik, Advocates. versus VIMAL AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is judgment debtor and after hearing arguments, submits that as per instructions, the entire balance decretal amount would be paid on or before 31.01.2026. As a gesture thereof, a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- shall be deposited within two days, before the learned Execution Court. 2. He, however, submits that in view of the above, the auction of the property in question be kept in abeyance. 3. The impugned order would reflect that the learned Trial Court, in order to realize the decretal amount, has directed one property to be attached and to be sold by way of auction. 4. Such property is situated at Model Town, Delhi and its reserve price has been settled as Rs.1,13,85,283/-. 5. The matter has been fixed before the learned Executing Court on 6. Learned counsel f