ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. vs THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~79 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 07.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2033/2025 & CRL.M.A. 9179/2025 EXEMPTION ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Garima Mudgal and Mr. Vinay Mudgal, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. … Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. Mr. Dewal Singh, Ms. Renu Bala, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Pulkit Singh, Mr. Chalsi Singh, Advocates for R-2. Respondents in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under section 528 BNSS seeking the quashing of the FIR NO. 202/2021 Under Sections 323/354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered at P.S. Samaypur Badli and all the proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 2033/2025 Page 1 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:08.08.2025 10:41:51 2. As per allegations made in the FIR, respondent No. 3 gave slaps and pulled the chunni of the complainant and threw the same in the street, and thereafter, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 had beaten up her husband. FIR was lodged on the complaint made by the complainant under Sections 323/354B/34 IPC. Chargesheet has since been filed under Sections 323/354B/34 IPC. 3. It has been submitted that a cross FIR No. 207/2021, Police Station Samay Pur Badli was registered at the instance of wife of petitioner No. 1 and that both parties have now entered into a settlement vide MoU/compromise deed dated 11,03.2024, copy of which is annexed as Annexure C. 4. Parties are physically present before the Court . They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer, from PS Samaypur Badli. 5. Respondent No.2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with t