ARYAN @ MAXI vs STATE

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 30.07.2025 Pronounced on : 04.08.2025 + CRL.A.1195/2016 ARYAN @ MAXI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar and Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocates versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State + CRL.A.1026/2017 VICKY @ VIKAS @GANJA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Moksh Arora, Advocate versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT 1. The appellants, through the present appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C. impugns the judgment on conviction dated 24.09.2016 and order on sentence dated 29.09.2016 in SC No.191/2013 arising out of FIR No.186/2013 registered under Sections 392/394/397/34 IPC at P.S. Rani Bagh, Delhi. On conclusion of the investigation, the chargesheet came to be filed under Sections 392/394/397/411/414/34 IPC. Signature Not Verified Signed By:GAUTAM CRL.A.1195/2016 & CRL.A.1026/2017 Page 1 of 10 ASWAL Signing Date:05.08.2025 17:15:10 Vide the impugned judgment, the appellant in CRL.A.1195/2016, namely, Aryan @ Maxi, has been convicted under Sections 392/394/34 IPC, and the appellant in CRL.A.1026/2017, namely, Vicky @ Vikas @ Ganja, has been convicted under Sections 392/394/397 IPC. There were two other accused, namely Neeraj @ Rahul who was convicted under Sections 392/394/34 IPC and Ispreet Singh @Honney who was convicted under Section 411 IPC. Vide order on sentence, appellants were sentenced to undergo RI for 07 years for the offence under Section 392 IPC along with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default whereof, appellants were sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 02 months and further sentenced to undergo RI for 09 years for the offence under Sections 394 IPC along with fine of