Delhi High Court · 2025-08-06
ARCHI CONSTRUCTION, THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR. PANKAJ GUPTA & ANR. vs NAMITA CHAKRABORTY & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- CM(M)-1446/2023 2025:DHC:6595
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- ARCHI CONSTRUCTION, THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR. PANKAJ GUPTA & ANR.
- Respondent
- NAMITA CHAKRABORTY & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 06th August, 2025 CM(M) 1446/2023 & CM APPL. 46181/2023 ARCHI CONSTRUCTION, THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR. PANKAJ GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Advocate (appearance not given). versus NAMITA CHAKRABORTY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shamik Bagehi & Mr. Farhad Mallik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 01.08.2023 passed by learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short ‘NCDRC’) in Revision Petition No. 1608/2023. 2. The above matter was filed before learned NCDRC impugning order dated 31.05.2023 passed by learned State Commission, Kolkata in First Appeal No.A-283/2022. 3. Since the cause of action pertaining to the present subject matter has arisen within the jurisdiction of other High Court, relying upon judgments dated 04.03.2024 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Siddhartha S 4. In Siddhartha S Mookerjee (supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court has, very categorically, observed that merely because NCDRC, having seat in Delhi, had allowed petition, the jurisd