Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-28

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 994 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 994 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 994 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 994 of 2025 Prakash Nut And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. AFR Court No. - 15 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. 1. The applicants are aggrieved by the sureties fixed by the learned trial court while granting bail to them by orders dated 01.08.2025 and 25.07.2025. As per the impugned orders, only local sureties have to be furnished by the applicants. 2. Shri Nijam Ahamad, learned counsel for the applicants contends that the applicants assailing the condition of local sureties required to be furnished by the applicants in the order granting bail submits that the learned trial court has made surety demands in a mechanical manner and without due application of mind to the relevant considerations as laid down in the judgement rendered by this Court in Arvind Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. (Application U/S 482 No.2613 of 2023. Shri Nijam Ahamad, learned counsel for the applicants further contends that all the applicants have relations in district-Chandauli a

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 994 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam