ANAND TANWAR vs POONAM ANAND TANWAR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 22nd July, 2025 Pronounced on: 13th August, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 6579/2018, CRL.M.A. 50531/2018 ANAND TANWAR S/o Sh. Harpal Singh, R/o Room No.5, E.W.S., Rail Vihar, Sector -57, Gurgoan, Haryana. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Petitioner. versus POONAM ANAND TANWAR W/o Sh. Anand Tanwar, D/o Sh. Krishan Chand, R/o O-380, Ground Floor, Flat No. 3, Sourabh Vihar, Jaitpur, Badarpur, New Delhi. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Braham Vati, Advocate with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner against judgment dated 09.08.2018 of learned ASJ, whereby the Appeal preferred against the Order of learned Signature Not Verified CRL.A 781/2025 Page 1 of 8 Signed By:RITA SHARMA Signing Date:13.08.2025 17:07:10 MM dated 07.01.2017 directing the Petitioner to pay Rs.33,332/- per month to the Respondent and their three children in a Petition under S. Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (herein after referred to as ‘the DV Act’), was upheld. 2. Brief facts are that Complaint was filed by the Resopndent/Smt. Poonam Anand Tanwar seeking Monetary Relief under Section 20 DV Act aside from Protection, Monetary and Compensation Order. 3. Respondent got married to the Petitioner/Anand Tanwar on 23.01.2011 and three children (i.e. two boys and one girl) were born from their wedlock. She claimed that she was harassed and mercilessly beaten on account of dowry because of which strain came in their matrimonial relationship. With passage of time when the Petitioner failed to mend his behaviour, she