Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-28

WRIT TAX No. 390 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT TAX No. 390 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT TAX No. 390 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24154-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 390 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Muskan Trading Company, Ambedkarnagar Thru. Proprietor Beena Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. State Tax Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Raziullah,Zartab Qamar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. At the very outset, Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that the petitioner as against the impugned order passed under Section 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has an alternate and efficacious remedy under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. This fact is not disputed by learned Counsel for the petitioner. 3. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy as prescribed under law. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (Om Pra

WRIT TAX No. 390 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam