Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-01

WRIT TAX No. 1196 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT TAX No. 1196 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT TAX No. 1196 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:44244-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1196 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/s Anand Creations Having its Office at Civil Lines Respondent :- State of U.P. and another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Yadav, Pranjal Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Ankur Agarwal, C.S.C. Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. This writ petition is directed against the ex-parte demand order dated 28.08.2024 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax Bareilly, Sector-1, Bareilly under Section 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. Learned counsel with reference to judgment in M/s Hari Shanker Transport Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax U.P. : Writ Tax No.606 of 2025, decided on 11.03.2025, made submissions that the order impugned does not fulfill the requirement of Section 75(6) of the Act and, therefore, the order impugned deserves to be quashed and set aside and the matter be remanded back. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents attempted to support the order impugned, however, does not dispute that the issue as raised is covered by the judgment in the case of M/s Hari Shanker Transport (supra). 4. In the

WRIT TAX No. 1196 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam