Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-28

WRIT - C No. 3875 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3875 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3875 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24066-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3875 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Yadav,Suryansh Narula Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Ms. Surabhi Rawat holding brief of Shri Suryansh Narula, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional C.S.C. for the State alongwith learned counsel for the RERA. 2. If there is no legal impediment, then, the opposite party no. 4, which is a statutory authority, should satisfy the recovery certificate issued by RERA and deposit the due amount within a reasonable time, say, within a period of one month, failing which the District Magistrate/Collector, Lucknow would be obliged to recover the same and remit to RERA so that the petitioner may receive it. 3. This of course is without prejudice to the rights of the opposite party no. 4 if the proceedings out of which the recovery certificate arises have been assailed in appeal etc., although, the petitioner'

WRIT - C No. 3875 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam