Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-09

WRIT - C No. 10486 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 10486 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 10486 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51598-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10486 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sundari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent and Sri Chetan Chatterjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 5. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authority in deciding the representation dated February 11, 2025 filed by them. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.4 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the responden

WRIT - C No. 10486 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam