Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-24

WRIT - B No. 13075 of 2012 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 13075 of 2012 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 13075 of 2012 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63290 A.F.R. Reserved on 06.12.2024 Delivered on 24.04.2025 Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 13075 of 2012 Petitioner :- Rajkumar Dubey Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Singh,Ashutosh Srivastava,Govind Krishna,Satyendra Nath Srivastava,Shreyas Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- D.D. Chauhan,Madhur Prakash,Satya Prakash Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the contesting private respondents as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the orders passed by the revenue courts under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (in brevity 'Act, 1950') whereby suit filed on his behalf for declaration of his rights and title under Section 229-B of Act, 1950 has concurrently been discarded by all the three revenue courts on the point of maintainability of suit being barred under Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (in brevity 'U.P.C.H. Act'), while deciding the issue no.7 framed by the learned trial court. 3. As per plaint case, the plaintiff-petitioner is claiming his right

WRIT - B No. 13075 of 2012 at Allahabad · Niyam