Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-04

WRIT - A No. 4042 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 4042 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 4042 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:48204 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4042 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ragini Katiyar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Shukla,Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was transferred from Kanpur to Lucknow on her own request vide order dated 29.6.2024, however, on the very next date, same order came to be recalled on 30.6.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the order is silent as to the reason for recalling of earlier order passed date 29.6.2024, but perhaps according to him, reason is petitioner's home district shown as Lucknow and Kannauj in the official records. He submits that service book contains home district of petitioner as Kannauj only. It is in such circumstances, therefore, , he pleads that the order dated 30.6.2024 needs to be quashed. Learned Standing Counsel submits that since petitioner has already approached the competent authority by making representation dated 26.10.

WRIT - A No. 4042 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam