Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-01

WRIT - A No. 3227 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3227 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3227 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17943-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3227 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anuj Kumar Yadav And Another Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. The Secy. Ministry Of Communication Deptt. Of Posts And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar,Sudhanshu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Alok Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to justify as to how sufficient number of candidates were available for being inducted either by promotion or through deputation. In absence of definite averments regarding the zone of eligibility or the candidates available, it is difficult for this Court to find any error in the interim order passed by the learned Tribunal rejecting the interim prayer made in the original application. Thus, leaving it open for the petitioners to disclose categorically all the relevant facts and the figures regarding the zone of eligibility in the two sources of recruitment i.e. promotion/deputation, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case any such application is filed by the pet

WRIT - A No. 3227 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam