Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-10

WRIT - A No. 20778 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 20778 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 20778 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52907 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20778 of 2024 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Aditya,Nagendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Siddharth Singhal Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Aditya, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Siddharth Singhal, learned Advocate appearing for respondent No.2. 2. It is contended by Shri Singhal, that the petitioner being selected in the written test was invited for document verification but he failed to appear and accordingly his candidature could not be considered. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent Commission that every information regarding advertisement and thereafter selection and recommendation of every stage of selection is uploaded in the official website of the Commission as per clause 11 of the advertisement No. 4/2018. It is further submitted that there is no provision for intimation of information to every individual who has been selected and, hence, petitioner cannot take the plea that since he was not individually informed and was since posted at Jammu &Kashmir, he could not appear befor

WRIT - A No. 20778 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam