Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-02

WRIT - A No. 1753 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1753 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1753 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:45362 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1753 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shree Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pusp Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has questioned appointment of respondent no.5 as Chaukidaar made on 12.12.2022. No possible explanation has come for in the petition for approaching this Court for such a long delay of three years. The only ground taken is that some enquiry has been conducted in the matter and appointment of those who were to attain the age of 60 years in 2022 was held to be bad. 3. Upon a pointed query being made, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is still 57 years of age. Upon a further query being made as to how his age is to be determined he takes the Court to the photocopy of Adhar Card of the petitioner, however, I find that in Adhar Card date of birth of the petitioner is recorded as 01.01.1965 as per which the petitioner has already attained the age of 60 years. Thus, since the petitioner

WRIT - A No. 1753 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam