VINOD KUMAR vs STATE & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 21.04.2025 + CRL.REV.P. 473/2024 & CRL.M.A. 10755/2024 VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta and Mr. Shubhangam Thakur, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. + CRL.REV.P. 474/2024 & CRL.M.A. 10757/2024 UMA AND ORS ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta and Mr. Shubhangam Thakur, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of these revision petitions, the petitioners seek setting aside of the order dated 16.03.2024 [hereafter ‘impugned order’] CRL.REV.P.473/2024 & connected matter Page 1 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:25.04.2025 17:38:59 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Special FTSC) (POCSO)-01, South West Dwarka, New Delhi [hereafter ‘Trial Court’] in case arising out of FIR No. 402/2023, registered at Police Station Dabri, Delhi, by way of which charges were framed against the petitioners. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the FIR in this case was registered on 10.06.2023, on the complaint of Ms. ‘H’ (victim’s mother), wherein she had alleged that the accused persons had molested her four-years-old son (the victim), and had touched his private parts and also used abusive words in front of him, on 08.01.2023 at about 2:45 PM. It was also alleged that the accused persons had been torturing and blackmailing them for leaving the house. On these allegations, the present FIR was registered against Vinod Kumar, Shashank, Uma, Kanishka, Nisha and Jyoti, for commission of offenc