VINOD @ BINNU vs THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 920/2025 VINOD @ BINNU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.M. Shukla, Advocate versus THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State with Inspr. M.S. Kamal, SHO and Inspr. Sri Bhagwan, PS Rajouri Garden, Delhi CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks bail in case FIR No. 03/2022 of Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi for offence under Sections 302/34 IPC. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant as well as learned prosecutor. 3. Broadly speaking, the case set up by prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence, in the form of evidence of last seen and recovery of weapon of offence at the instance of accused/applicant from dickey of BAIL APPLN. 920/2025 pages 4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant argues that the entire case set up by the prosecution is false. It is also contended by him that neither the accused/applicant was present at the spot of the alleged occurrence nor any incriminating article was recovered at his instance. Learned counsel for BAIL APPLN. 920/2025 pages GIRISH 5. In response