VINEET KAPUR vs REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 22/2024 VINEET KAPUR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vaibhav Vutts, Ms. Bijaharini G., Ms. Aamna Hasan and Ms. Aarya Deshmukh, Advs. M: 9971576500 Email: [email protected] versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Zubin Singh and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advs. for R-1. M: 9891088658 Email: [email protected] CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA JUDGMENT % 25.04.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J: 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Trade Marks Act”) and under Rule 156 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, challenging the order dated 29th February, 2024, passed by the learned Registrar of Trademarks, by which the application of the appellant bearing application no. 5151862 dated 28th September, 2021, for registration of the mark ‘2929’ in Class 3, in respect of cosmetics, nail polish, soaps, shampoos etc., was rejected. 2. It is the case of the appellant that the mark ‘2929’ was conceived and adopted, in relation to goods when no such mark existed or was known in 3. Per contra, it is the case of the respondent that the mark in question has not a