VIJAY KUMAR vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1220/2025 VIJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with Inspector Jeetendra Tiwari and SI Akashdeep. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. In furtherance of last order, learned prosecutor has shown me the videography of the search carried out at the residence of the accused/applicant and prima facie, the same does not reflect any portion to suspect the genuineness of the raid, though this has to be tested during trial. 2. I have heard the further arguments from both sides. 3. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 79/2025 of PS Bharat Nagar for offence under Section 21/25 NDPS Act on the allegations that from residence of the accused/applicant and his son, 201 grams + 164 grams of heroin was recovered and son of the BAIL APPLN. 1220/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.25 16:57:52 Signature Not Verified -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:25.04.2025 18:40:05 accused/applicant was arrested. The accused/applicant was not present at the time of raid, so now he seeks anticipatory bail. 4. On behalf of accused/applicant it is argued that the FIR has been registered as an act of vendetta because daughter of the accused/applicant had lodged a complaint of harassment against a local police constable. It is further submitted by learned counsel for accused/applicant that presently apart from the statement of son of the accused/applicant, whereby he alleged that it is the accused/applicant only who knows the source of the contraband, there is no other material. Learned