Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-22

VIJAY KUMAR OJHA vs SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Citation / case number
CS(OS)-362/2018 2025:DHC:2971
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VIJAY KUMAR OJHA
Respondent
SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22.04.2025 CS(OS) 362/2018 & I.A. 12133/2023 I.A. 14543/2023 I.A. 8187/2025 I.A. 8227/2025 I.A. 10047/2025 O.A. 63/2023 VIJAY KUMAR OJHA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate (through VC) with plaintiff in person versus SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv., Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Mr. Tarang Agarwal, Ms. Aastha Bansal, Advocates % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL): IA 10047/2025 (Application under Order VII Rule 10 by defendant) 1. The present application has been filed by the Defendant under Order VII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) seeking return of the plaint on the ground that this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate the present plaint. 2. The present suit has been instituted by the Plaintiff seeking a declaration that his termination by the Defendant Company is illegal and bad in law, inter-alia the Plaintiff seeks a decree for damages to the tune of Rs. 2.1. As per the plaint the Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company on 01.10.2003 as a