VERMEET SINGH TANEJA vs JASMEET KAUR

Judgment text excerpt

$~123 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 07.04.2025 CONT.CAS(C) 534/2025 & CM APPL. 20478/2025 VERMEET SINGH TANEJA .....Petitioner Through: Ms.Preeti Singh, Mr.S.Porwal, Ms.Shefali, Ms.Sakshi Trivedi, Ms.Ayushi Kumari, Advs. along with petitioner in person. versus JASMEET KAUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anshuman Gargesh, Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advs. along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, complaining that the respondent has violated the Order dated 07.05.2024 passed by this Court in MAT.APP. (F.C.)155/2024, titled Vermeet Singh Taneja v. Jasmeet Kaur. 2. By the above order, this Court had disposed of the appeal filed by the appellant herein, by observing and directing as under: “4. Ms Preeti Singh, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/husband, submits that the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT. CAS(C) 534/2025 Page 1 of 3 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:10.04.2025 18:30:57 appellant/husband would be satisfied if the child is not shifted from the school in which he is presently admitted in i.e., Prudence School, Pitampura and he is given a say in case the respondent/wife decides to change the child’s school once again. 5. Mr Satish Singhal, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent/wife, says that the respondent will abide by any such direction issued by the Court. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with a direction that in future, the decision with regard to the child’s school will be taken jointly. 6.1 In the event the couple is unable to arrive at a mutually agreed decision, the Court will evaluate the matter on merits and