Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-02

VEENITA AGGRAWAL vs RAJESH KUMAR & ORS.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-604/2025 2025:DHC:2298
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VEENITA AGGRAWAL
Respondent
RAJESH KUMAR & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 2nd April, 2025 CM(M) 604/2025 & CM APPL. 19117/2025 VEENITA AGGRAWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Madan and Mr. Deevansh, Advocates. versus RAJESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate for R-7/MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner has filed a suit for damages, permanent and mandatory injunction. 2. He claims himself to be the owner of a first floor shop, situated at Jyoti Market, Delhi and alleged that unauthorized construction had been carried out at third floor of the same property. It is on account of such alleged unauthorized construction that the petitioner has filed the above suit for injunction and damages. 3. The petitioner filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC seeking appointment of Local Commissioner before the learned Trial Court and has taken exception to dismissal of such application. 4. I have seen order dated 21.10.2024 which is under challenge. 5. Learned Trial, while dismissing the abovesaid application, has observed that the endeavour of the plaintiff is to get the evidence collected through Court, by seeking appointm