UTO NEDERLAND V. vs TILAKNAGAR INDUSTRIES LTD

66.12-appeal.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2012 2024. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate and Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. H. W. Kane, Mr. Rohan Kelkar, Mr. Rohan Kadam, Mr. Manvendra Kane, Mr. Ashutosh Kane, Ms. Vedangi Soman and Mr. I. K. Paranjape i/b Mr. H. W. Kane for the Respondent in APP/66/2012 CORAM: ALOK ARADHE, CJ., M. S. KARNIK & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. RESERVED ON : APRIL 21, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : APRIL 28, 2025 JUDGMENT (PER : CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. A Division Bench of this Court noticed irreconcilable conflict of views expressed by Division Benches of this Court in COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY AND ANOTHER VS. ANCHOR HEALTH AND BEAUTY CARE PVT. LTD.1 and PARKSONS CARTAMUNDI PVT. LTD. VS. SURESH KUMAR JASRAJ BURAD2 as well as GOLDMINES TELEFILMS PVT. LTD. VS. RELIANCE BIG ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. AND ORS.3 with regard to following aspects; (i) Whether order passed on an application for temporary injunction is prima facie adjudication and not an exercise of discretion (ii) Scope of appeal from an order of the trial court on an application of injunction. 1 2005(1) Mh.L.J. 613 2 2012 SCC OnLine Bom 43