Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-25

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. vs EX WO KISHORE KUMAR TOMAR

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-5327/2025 2025:DHC:2986-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Respondent
EX WO KISHORE KUMAR TOMAR

Judgment text excerpt

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5327/2025, CM APPL. 24269/2025 & CM APPL. 24270/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anshuman, SPC versus EX WO KISHORE KUMAR TOMAR .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 25.04.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This petition assails order dated 11 December 2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal1 in OA 564/2022 whereby the respondent’s application for grant of disability pension on the ground that he suffers from Primary Hypertension with 30% disability have been allowed by the AFT. 2. The issue is covered by a recent decision rendered by us in UOI v Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso2. 3. Nonetheless, we have heard Mr. Anshuman, SPC, learned 1 “the AFT”, hereinafter 2 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018 W.P.(C) 5327/2025 Signature Not Verified Page 1 of 8 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:29.04.2025 11:12:32 Counsel for the petitioner, and have perused the record. 4. The respondent was released in Low Medical Category on his being found to be suffering from Primary Hypertension. From the record, including the proceedings of the Release Medical Board3, the following facts emerged: (i) The respondent had served in the Indian Air Force for over 37½ years before he was diagnosed as suffering from Primary Hypertension. (ii) The respondent, in his self-declaration, specifically declared that he had not been suffering from Primary Hypertension prior to joining the Air Force. The declaration reads thus: 2. (a.) Did you suffer from any disability before joining the Armed Forces? If so give details and dates: NO The correctness of this declaration is not doubted either by the RMB or by the petitioner before the AFT or before this Court. (iii

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. vs EX WO KISHORE KUMAR TOMAR · Niyam