UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. vs RAMESHWAR TIWARI

Judgment text excerpt

$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 08.04.2025 + W.P.(C) 7188/2024 & CM APPL. 30038/2024 & CM APPL. 30039/2024 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr.Nitin & Ms.Divya Rana, Advs. versus RAMESHWAR TIWARI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Puneet Taneja, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manmohan Singh Narula, Mr.Amit Yadav & Mr.Anil Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 18.10.2022 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (in short, ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. 194/2021, titled Rameshwar Tiwari v. Union of India & Ors., allowing the said O.A. filed by the respondent, with the following directions: “14. However, in the present facts of the case decision has been taken by virtue of order dated 24.01.2020, therefore, no useful purpose will be served in remanding the matter back regarding disposal of the representation. In this scenario, the present OA is allowed in terms of the order passed by the Hon’ble High Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 7188/2024 Page 1 of 8 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:10.04.2025 18:40:21 Court in Shiv Mangal Rai case (supra). The respondents are directed to fix pension as payable to Mr. Rameshwar Tiwari on superannuation on 28.02.1998 and re-fix the pension accordingly. A revised PPO in terms of the Rule Position be issued within a period of two months from date of receipt of certified copy of the order, failing which the applicant shall be entitled to GPF rate of interest till the date of actual payment.” 2. The respondent had filed the above O.A. praying for a direction to the petitioners to fix his pension as on the date of his sup