SUSHIL YADAV vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 04.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4192/2024 SUSHIL YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with Inspector Daljeet, PS Rohini (North) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Heard. 2. The accused/applicant, suffering incarceration since 09.01.2020 seeks to be released on bail in case FIR No. 344/2019 of Police Station Rohini North for offence under sections 302/201/120B/34 IPC read with Section 27 of Arms Act. 3. Broadly speaking, the case set up by prosecution is that the deceased Jitender had some loan dispute with Raj Kumar and in that connection, Raj Kumar and his associates called the deceased to the office of Raj Kumar on BAIL APPLN. 4192/2024 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, ou=DELHI HIGH COURT, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4 835d435f97626cacca, postalCode=110003, st=DELHI, KATHPALIA serialNumber=D3E86796451EC45C07B5D15570996B40F80CB D2EEE60402C487965FF801E26FA, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.04 13:16:56 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:04.04.2025 17:56:44 the fateful night. According to prosecution, at that time in the office of Raj Kumar, all accused persons namely Naresh, Vijay, Raj Kumar and Sushil (accused/applicant) were present. It is specific case of prosecution that it is Raj Kumar who fired a shot from his pistol, thereby killing Jitender on the spot. 4. Learned Senior Counsel for accused/applicant has taken me through complete record including the status report filed by the prosecution. Learned Senior Co