SUNIL TOMAR vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 08.04.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 8762/2024 SUNIL TOMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ranbir Sharma, Adv. Petitioner in person. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ...Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with SI Nishi, P.S.GK-1. Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Gurnar Arora and Ms. Gauri Jha, Advs. for R-2 R-2 in person. CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of the petitioner, seeking quashing FIR No. 189 of 2022, dated 14.09.2022 P.S. Greater Kailash-I under Section 323/506 IPC read with 25/54/59 Arms Act and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. Crl.M.C. 8762/2024 Page 1 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNITA KUMARI Signing Date:09.04.2025 11:35:59 2. The marriage between Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 09.11.2008. From this wedlock, two children namely Avni Tomar and Vihaan Tomar were born. Due to temperamental differences and domestic issue, the father of the respondent no. 2 called the police and the aforesaid FIR was registered against the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on 14.09.2022 and was later granted regular bail by the Ld. Trial Court on 17.09.2022. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 mutually decided to resolve their differences. They have started residing together again under one roof with their children since then. 4. Petitioner no. 1 and Respondent no. 2 are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer, SI N