Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-04

SUDHANSHU AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4345/2025 2025:DHC:2806-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SUDHANSHU AND ORS
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4345/2025 & CM APPL. 20076/2025 SUDHANSHU AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar and Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Gokul Sharma, G.P. and Mr. Satyam Singh, Adv. for respondents/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 04.04.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The DIG, Special Security Group1, Central Industrial Security Force2, vide Office order dated 19 August 2024, notified the process for selecting candidates against vacancies of SI/Exe., HC/GD, CT/GD and CT and CT/Cook at HCI Dhaka, AHCI Chittagong, AHCI Rajshahi, AHCI Khulna and AHCI Sylhet. Para 2 of the Office Order clearly stated that the selection of personnel would be made in accordance with the SOP3 issued in that regard and the age criteria 1 “SSG” hereinafter 2 “CISF” hereinafter 3 Standard Operating Procedure 2019. The age criteria and educational qualifications, which a candidate was required to fulfil to be eligible for deployment as a replacement for the aforesaid posts, were contained in para 3 (a)